vertical-endeavour.com

Giants Hut

Written by domsmooth
Drakensberg - Hiking
Wednesday, 20 August 2008 22:53

A recent trip to the Giants Castle area was rewarded with fantastic game viewing, but dampened by the sad sight of the Giant's Hut without a roof and in a terrible state of disrepair.

Game sightings included Oribi (classified as "Critically Endangered" in the SANBI Red Data Book), Eland, Blesbok (possibly moved up from Highmoor), and Mountain Reedbuck (as well as the ever present Chacma Baboon). Birds spotted along the route included "Vulnerable" Bald Ibis, "Endangered" Bearded Vulture and Cape Vulture, amoung other birds.

 The route we took was up Oribi Ridge, past the hut, to inspect the damage, down the middle ridge back to the Main Caves. Giant's Hut was a great stop over for those hikers wanting to take an easy first day to the hut, and then on to the top of the Giant, or for a few walks in the area around the hut. The view from the hut have always inspired many, and when you see the view through the new "skylight" it is plain to understand why. Easy options from the hut include the eastern ridge (as daunting as it may seem...), Giant's pass, or a traverse across to Bannerman Hut (along the contour path).

**These images will be republished soon  - please bear with us**

   
 The hut as it currently looks

 The hut, as can be seen from the pictures, has been burnt again recently, subsequent to the initial fire (the first fire was about 2 years ago) which destroyed the roof.  The damage includes the windows (the frames are still in place, but no glass exists anymore); door frames, now charred remains; sink, which has pulled away from the wall; and a blackened toilet, complete with melted seat... It appears that some hikers or Basotho have recently taken refuge there, although they left most of their rubbish behind, not sticking to the hikers credo.

The theories of how the hut burnt down abound, ranging from a lack of firebreak management around the hut, to the Basotho burning it down intentionally. Whatever the case is, the hut currently is not much of a shelter from a downpour - or wind for that matter, since there is much broken glass in corners where one could shelter from wind.

Evidence of Basothos using the hut are minimal, and even the contour path seems to indicate only animal use for the most part. The old jeep track (from Gaints to Highmoor) is in the process of being rehabilitated, and will probably take some time to be integrated back into the landscape. The contour path, and the path up Oribi Ridge past the old Vulture Hide, still remains a clear scar on the landscape. It does seem that Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife are working at rehabilitating the track and the contour path where erosion has been creating havoc. Basotho use now seems to be more on the south side of the Giant, and on Bannerman Pass. Evidence suggests that Jarateng is a well used alternative to Langalibelele now also, but we never got close enough to investigate further on this trip.

The way forward appears to be that the hut will either be destroyed, or fixed up. The purpose of this article is perhaps theoretical, or historical. We would like to generate some discussion around the hut, and for those who have good memories from there to share those. If you have bad memories, please feel free to share those too. We want to know your thoughts!

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 03 November 2010 15:00 )
 
Discuss this article
You need to log in or register to participate in this discussion.

Posted: 29 Aug 2008 21:30 by domsmooth #132
Intrepid. While you mention that the hut is not in a wilderness area, the world heritage values for which the Berg was granted its status, are wilderness, and the heritage value (for the bushman relics and paintings). In other words, in terms of management, the entire Ukahlamba Drakensberg area is considered a wilderness area. True, there are some areas which are so called "wilderness" areas in which no new man made infrastructure is allowed. The same can be said for the non-wilderness areas though, where any new infrastructure needs approval from not only the management authority, but also the competent authority for Impact assessments, in this case the Dept of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT).

The hut, though, is an existing structure. It existed long before the area was declared, and as such needs no authorisation from DEAT to repair the hut to its former condition.

Steel roofs would be preferable from a fire perspective, since the previous thatch (I think) obviously has too much risk attached from a fire perspective. Furthermore, any water pipes would also be pvc and stand to be burnt in the next fire that moves through. It would be preferable to go for a more sustainable approach to repair the hut. Most who would use the hut, have also camped in a tent, and would be used to walking a little way to fetch water. Furthermore, they would also have used holes in the ground for ablutions. Other options are available for toilets though, although the location of this hut adjacent to the tarn for ablutions and septic tanks are not really considered enviro-friendly.

I agree that the hut is there, and that it should either be removed if it is not to be repaired, since the current status is an eye-sore. The concern is more about how to get a contractor to the site to do the work without impacting on the surrounds, or getting the materials there without an impact on the area. Vehicular access is not an option.

Personally, I hope the hut is repaired. It is perfectly sited for forays around the Giants area.

Login

Logging in unlocks access to material and functionality which is otherwise not visible!