Ethereal Tower

16 May 2012 12:13 #53908 by HFc
Replied by HFc on topic Re: Ethereal Tower
Thanks Sterkhorn. So, next one further south.

Amazing always when one gets up there to see how rugged and clefted the amphi wall actually is.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jun 2013 19:46 #57197 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Re: Ethereal Tower

RobD wrote: Hi. I'm pretty sure Intrepid is right - it's the only free-stander of any significance off the escarpment but at the same height with a good bit of grass on the top. Located very soon after the Bilanjil walking South. Many years ago some goon had obviously climbed it, and put a "NO CAMPING" sign on it. I appreciated the humour.

@Rob: did you climb it yourself? Any beta would be appreciated.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jun 2013 20:02 #57198 by RobD
Replied by RobD on topic Re: Ethereal Tower
Nope, not yet! Have had a good look at it, as I'm sure many of us have, but nothing more than that. Mnt_Tiska?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Jul 2013 18:52 #57763 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Ethereal Tower
Had a fresh look at what the Ethereal Tower could be on a recent trip to the area. The big, dominant tower we've been considering in this thread looks pretty difficult to climb, involving some very unprotected and sustained sections. If I've understood things correctly, it looms directly over the "exit gully" mentioned in the Amphitheatre Frontal climbing RDs.



Also had a look at the other pinnacle, which has been referred to as The Castle. It is much smaller and looms more or less directly over the middle of the "W" feature below, also described in the Amphitheatre RD.





Having returned with a fresher perspective, I re-examined the labelled photo found in Dodd's "Cradle of Rivers". I have marked in the "W" and labelled the bigger pinnacle too. It appears that the Ethereal Tower is in fact the smaller of the two pinnacles (ie The Castle). The map which was posted in the first post of this thread, also indicates that the Ethereal Tower is very close to Bilanjil Falls. This is very true for the smaller pinnacle, but not the bigger one. Furthermore, the "exit gully" is also discernible on this portion of the map, and it is further away from the Tower. Seems a bit disappointing, but it appears this is what the historical references are pointing to.


Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.

Please login or register to view the images attached to this post.

The following user(s) said Thank You: ghaznavid, tonymarshall, HFc

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
22 Jul 2013 14:56 #57771 by DoctorG
Replied by DoctorG on topic Re: Ethereal Tower

intrepid wrote:

RobD wrote: Hi. I'm pretty sure Intrepid is right - it's the only free-stander of any significance off the escarpment but at the same height with a good bit of grass on the top. Located very soon after the Bilanjil walking South. Many years ago some goon had obviously climbed it, and put a "NO CAMPING" sign on it. I appreciated the humour.

@Rob: did you climb it yourself? Any beta would be appreciated.



Its just amazing to think that if this tower was climbed, we have heard nothing about it. while standing on the Amphitheater wall a few weeks ago and looking at it, this would of being one hell of a peak to climb. the only way I can think of is by leaving a fixed line on the Amphitheater wall, rapping down into the neck and climbing the tower which looks like it would go at a grade no less than F3.
I would love to find out who climbed this.......

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Powered by Kunena Forum