Possible 4X4 expedition to Thabana Ntlenyana peak

More
16 May 2011 07:42 #2873 by SeriousTribe2
There is a comment on this thread relating to the inferrence that there will be trouble from EKZN....

"It is outside of Parksboard area"....

Does TnL fall within the proclaimed WHS area?

Anyone know? Intrepid?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 May 2011 07:44 #2874 by intrepid
Groan... :sick:

Thanks for alerting the rest of us. I have just fired off some emails to various people who hopefully will have something to say, and may shed some light on what can be done about this. From the outset I'd like to encourage everyone in the hiking, climbing and conservation community (and all other concerned/affected groups) not to throw stones at the 4x4 community, and avoid nasty and destructive forum conversation as happened on various other sites over the previous issue where 4x4s where driving to the Amphitheatre edge. Not everyone in the 4x4 community is in favour of this kind of thing, and we can rally together with these people to work together for the conservation of our mountains. At the same time I call for zero tolerance of this kind of thing! Something must be done to address this issue once and for all.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 May 2011 07:54 - 16 May 2011 07:56 #2875 by intrepid

SeriousTribe2 wrote: There is a comment on this thread relating to the inferrence that there will be trouble from EKZN....

"It is outside of Parksboard area"....

Does TnL fall within the proclaimed WHS area?

Anyone know? Intrepid?

Unfortunately I dont think it falls under the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site. This does not mean that it is unprotected though, since it falls under the Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier area. How much protection this affords is not clear to me, but this potentially carries weight since this is a government-level agreement between South Africa and Lesotho, and we are supposed to work together in protecting the region. It may not be EKZNW land, but these people should not think they can do nothing about it - they can. They liaise with their Lesotho counterparts, and it does ultimately affect the UDP-WHS. I am in the process of informing numerous people at EKZNW, and various other individuals. I think some of the concerned representatives in the 4x4 community should be contacted too.

In the long term, I think one of the things we can rally for is a higher conservation status, if not World Heritage Status, for the greater Maloti-Drakensberg region....

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.
Last edit: 16 May 2011 07:56 by intrepid.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
24 May 2011 12:02 - 24 May 2011 12:05 #2962 by intrepid
Update: the issue was reported to various people and has now been officially reported to the Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Project. Also, I see several people on the 4x4 forum have discouraged the idea which is great.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.
Last edit: 24 May 2011 12:05 by intrepid. Reason: typo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
24 May 2011 19:16 #2966 by domsmooth
I am still waiting for a response from my management, but from my perspective, it should be a non-starter, and we will have the same stance on it as we had with the previous 4x4 issue. The top of the Berg is not a place for heavy 4x4 activity, as much as it may be a once off. There is a precedent set, and others will want to encroach on an area which is for foot and horse traffic only. The impacts of only one 4x4 will cause irreparable damage which will take many many years to recover!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Aug 2011 13:16 #3617 by Boerkie
Looks like this one died a silent death!! :thumbsup: Quite a heavy discussion ensued on the 4x4 forum.

@domsmooth - any news on this?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Aug 2011 14:18 #3619 by Boerkie
Yip this one is dead :woohoo:

Found this letter here.


CONSERVATION MANAGER ROYAL NATAL NATIONAL PARK


RE: FOUR BY FOUR TRIPS TO THE UDP WHS ESCARPMENT

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

We recently became aware that a certain tour company is advertising four by four trips to Mont Aux Sources, Tugela Falls, Sentinel and Amphitheatre. We would like to bring it to your attention that all these areas fall within the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site (UDP WHS) and that any unauthorised vehicular access is in contravention of the law.

Anyone visiting the above-mentioned areas does so by traversing the Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Conservation Area. In 2001 a Bilateral Agreement was signed between South Africa and Lesotho to establish a framework for the conservation of biological diversity and sustainable development in that area. The Maloti-Drakensberg is internationally recognized as a Centre of Endemism and exceptional biodiversity. The alpine soils that are located in that area are extremely sensitive to the impact of grazing animals, foot and especially vehicle traffic. Alpine soils in the Transfrontier Area are shallow and subject to frost-lift, which makes their erosion extremely easy. The establishment of any vehicle trails, either formal or informal, will have devastating results on the ecology and conservation of that area.

The area described above also encompasses semi primitive Wilderness area, by definition excluding vehicle use. The visual and auditory impacts of vehicles in the Wilderness are against the very essence of Wilderness ethics. In a South African 4X4 Forum email posting, about a trip held on the 3-5th April 2009 (see below), the damage caused to the grasslands are clearly visible. It is noted that the author parked +- 500 metres from Mont Aux Sources near the Chain ladders. The damage that is caused from such activities in such sensitive areas is significant and in all likelihood irreparable.

In addition to this, any person wishing to access the Amphitheatre, Tugela Falls and the Sentinel through whichever means, is required to do so via an authorized and legal entry point into Royal Natal National Park. Unauthorised entry into Royal Natal National Park is illegal and raises a number of grave concerns:

1. According to the Section 46 (1) of the National Environmental Protected Areas Act 75 of 2003, and
despite any other legislation, no person may without the written permission of the management authority (ie: entry permit or express permission) of a national park, nature reserve or world heritage site, enter or reside in the park, reserve or site. Doing so constitutes a criminal offence.

2. Royal Natal National Park is part of a Proclaimed World Heritage Site, promulgated through the World Heritage Convention Act, 1999 (Act No. 49 of 1999). The National Environmental Protected Areas Act 75 of 2003 (Section 50) embodies legislation related to commercial activities with in a World heritage Site, and requires that such activity may not negatively affect the survival of any species in or significantly disrupt the integrity of the ecological systems of the national park, nature reserve or world heritage site. Any vehicle access would undeniably affect the biota of the High Drakensberg, as can be seen below.

3. The KZN Nature Conservation Ordinance 15 of 1974 Section 7 (1)(a) states that no person may enter a park without permission. Section 15(1) Regulation 4 also prohibits driving off road in a park. To do so constitutes an offence.

4. Section 20 of the Listing Notice No R 386 as contemplated in the EIA Regulations enacted by the National Environmental Management Act of 1998 states that transformation of an area zoned for conservation use constitutes a Listed Activity and is therefore requires environmental authorization. Authorization will not be granted for such an activity. The rarity and sensitivity of the flora and fauna encountered in the High Drakensberg cannot be understated.

5. Visitors to the Amphitheatre from the recognized entry point are requested to sign the Mountain Rescue Register for their own safety. Should an accident occur eg: being caught in a snowstorm without supplies, a record of visitors to the area is essential. Those entering through unrecognized points do not fall within this safety net.


We therefore prohibit:

• further vehicular trips into the UDP WHS i.e. Royal Natal National Park (Mont Aux Sources, Thukela Falls, Sentinel and Amphitheater as advertised) other than paid entry through legal entry points,

• further advertising that bears reference to accessing the Amphitheatre, Tugela Falls or the Sentinel through any means other than through legal and approved access routes by the appropriate approved access method.

It cannot be stressed enough how damaging off road routes are in the Drakensberg, especially in the High ‘Berg.

Yours sincerely

Stephen Richert
Conservation Manager
Royal Natal National Park

For CEO : EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE
The following user(s) said Thank You: Philip

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Aug 2011 14:24 - 11 Aug 2011 14:24 #3620 by intrepid
Hopefully the idea did die.

That letter you found was one which was circulated to various sites, and addressed the previous issue. It was published here on VE.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.
Last edit: 11 Aug 2011 14:24 by intrepid.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Philip

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Aug 2011 23:55 #3625 by Serious tribe
Good work. 4X4ing has it's place, but not here. If you want to go there, take less beers and walk there!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Powered by Kunena Forum