Khulus

06 Jun 2011 07:14 #3044 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Re: Khulus
Most of the highest peaks are not the most impressive. Possibly why other peaks where mistaken to be the highest for so many years.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Jun 2011 20:10 #3048 by ghaznavid
Replied by ghaznavid on topic Re: Khulus
The peak that must be the most awesome to stand on the top of has to be the Trojan Wall, if I am correct it is the highest point on the escarpment edge, I look forward to conquering it some time.

My long-term plan is to conquer 100 khulus, and considering that I have no real plans to try the 2 Eastern Cape Peaks (maybe I'll do Ben McD some time, the pics of it always look cool), and I don't plan on doing many Free State Peaks (probably only the Namahadi Ridge area, but its also not high on my priority list), I pretty much plan to cover all Khulu's between Beacon Buttress and Knuckles. 172 peaks less 22 not in KZN less 22 rock climbing peaks leaves me with 128 to choose from. I plan to do all peaks in SA that are over 3300m and may also try the 3400m peaks in Lesotho (Thaba Ntlenyana and Makheka are high on my list)...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 May 2012 07:50 #53772 by ghaznavid
Replied by ghaznavid on topic Re: Khulus @ Cathedral
I have been checking over the Didima khulus after Tony Marshal and I had difficulty finding Mahout on the recent GT. My analysis of the area has found the following:

Khulus that I can't find and am therefore removing from the list

- Mahout 3109m
- Leopard 3109m (possibly the peak that is at the top of Xeni Pass, but I am imagining that this is Xeni Peak)

Khulus that are not on Mulsh's list

- 3286m peak east of Pampiring, by convention it should be called Eastmans Peak as that would come from the name of the nearest river, but considering that peak has nothing to do with the Eastman's ridge this would be a misleading name. Maybe Pampiring II is suitable
- 3001m Organ Pipes Peak, it meets the special inclusion of peaks named on a map
- 3167m peak between Tseketseke Peak and Cleft Peak, the nearest river is Tseke, so maybe Molareng works for this one as that is its Lesotho river.

I plan to put up a new updated khulu list soon...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 May 2012 08:14 #53785 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Re: Khulus
I think "Mahout" is the high dome behind The Elephant which is now shown as a 3209m spot height. Leopard is the prominent peak right by Xeni Pass. Xeni Peak is actually a large free-standing pinnacle which only becomes apparent if you hug the escarpment from Xeni Pass towards The Elephant.

Yes I agree that the 3286m peak east of Pampiring should be its own summit.

That 3167m spot height near Cleft was probably too close and too easy from Cleft for Murch to include it...will have a look more closely.

I think several of the Organ Pipes may actually be Khulus in their own right...something to think about.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ghaznavid

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 May 2012 08:41 #53787 by ghaznavid
Replied by ghaznavid on topic Re: Khulus

intrepid wrote: I think "Mahout" is the high dome behind The Elephant which is now shown as a 3209m spot height. Leopard is the prominent peak right by Xeni Pass. Xeni Peak is actually a large free-standing pinnacle which only becomes apparent if you hug the escarpment from Xeni Pass towards The Elephant.


Ok, then Tony and I climbed Mahout when we tried to climb it - we couldn't find a 3209m peak on the khulu list and the peak was clearly a khulu, so we named it "Cheetah" to be topical... I had a suspicion that Leopard was that peak above Xeni, I will add 3080 Xeni Peak back onto my khulu list.

intrepid wrote: That 3167m spot height near Cleft was probably too close and too easy from Cleft for Murch to include it...will have a look more closely.


I looked at it from Tseke Peak (it is within 1km of Tseke peak, but not Cleft, and thus it would disqualify Tseke if Tseke wasn't on a different ridge). Sadly I didn't get a photo of the peak itself, but it does meet the definition of a khulu by map.

intrepid wrote: I think several of the Organ Pipes may actually be Khulus in their own right...something to think about.


If you have heights of any 3000m+ pipes, please let me know :) The old Inner/Outer Horn story comes to mind, a free standing peak with more than 30m of rock climbing over 3000m is always a khulu.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 May 2012 10:32 #53929 by ghaznavid
Replied by ghaznavid on topic Re: Khulus
I have now "surveyed" the entire Berg south of Didima (I will get to Mnweni and RNNP some day), the following was found:

Monks Cowl

2 khulus at Monks Cowl are not on the map. I know Mhlwazini, but Sombrero I dont know (3228m).

Giants Castle

The 3156m peak between Bond and Porterhill is usually disqualified on distance from the 2 nearest peaks. However, the 2 nearest peaks (which should be disqualified by this distance factor, but Bond and Porterhill both get the special inclusion for historical relevance) are lower and a peak is not a khulu if "there is a higher khulu within its effort shadow". Thus this peak should be a khulu. A fitting name for it would be "Chief Langalibalele".

Vergelegen

4 khulus missing from the list:
- A peak near KaNtuba at 3044m
- Ntshintshini 3164m
- Mangaung 3106m
- Mkomazi 3279m

Thoughts?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 May 2012 11:35 #53930 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Re: Khulus
Will read this more carefully later, but quick comment on what Murch called "Sombrero": its actually at Injisuthi, on the escarpment edge between Leslies Pass and Injisuthi Pass (one of my guesses on your pic this morning). Not a bad little summit...and it is actually on the map :). Not crazy about the name but it does kind of look line one from Leslies Pass side.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ghaznavid

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 May 2012 12:19 #53933 by ghaznavid
Replied by ghaznavid on topic Re: Khulus
Ok, so then my question becomes where on earth is Shepherds Ridge Peak? Thought that was it. I agree, the name doesn't suite the Berg. Its name isn't "official", so we can always change it to Murch's Peak, has a better ring to it...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 May 2012 13:15 #53948 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Re: Khulus
Shepherds Ridge is what I choose to call Lithobolong. On the survey map the name appears twice in close proximity, once between Mafadi and the 3375m spot height in question, and a second time just west of Mafadi, in Lesotho :)
So it made more sense to me to refer to the 3375 summit as Lithobolong.

Murch originally assigned that name to a 2235m peak which assumably it was I've called Red Wall Peak, because of its direct association with the Red Wall. Its height is now recorded as 3337m.

The maps have been updated with respect to labels and heights since Murch draughted his list. So thats why there are these differences. Another example is what I've referred to as Botlolong (3333m), named after the river. He called it Thabana Tsooana, whereas the current maps give that name to it's Lesotho neighbour and leave Botlolong unlabelled.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
25 May 2012 12:12 #54064 by intrepid
Replied by intrepid on topic Re: Khulus

ghaznavid wrote: The 3156m peak between Bond and Porterhill is usually disqualified on distance from the 2 nearest peaks. However, the 2 nearest peaks (which should be disqualified by this distance factor, but Bond and Porterhill both get the special inclusion for historical relevance) are lower and a peak is not a khulu if "there is a higher khulu within its effort shadow". Thus this peak should be a khulu. A fitting name for it would be "Chief Langalibalele".

I think Bond, Potteril and Erskine can do with their own thread. If you compare maps, references and lists it gets confusing between these 3. Sometimes that 3156m peak is labelled as Bond.

Take nothing but litter, leave nothing but a cleaner Drakensberg.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
Powered by Kunena Forum